Queen Helter of Skelter: rufeepeach: calonari: rufeepeach: NO RUMPEL, STOP PERVING ON...
NO RUMPEL, STOP PERVING ON UNDERAGE!BELLE. YOU’RE NOT SUPPOSED TO DO THAT.
BAD DARK ONE, BAD!
DON’T MAKE ME HURT YOU. I HAVE MY ANGST!FIC RIGHT HERE, YOU KNOW.
no love,
rufeepeach
Yes gooood
love,
calonari
She’s fifteen, Cal!
At…
Yeah, I get all that. But Rumpel’s hundreds of years old; Belle is clearly in her twenties in canon and still only engaged to Gaston; he’s known her from childhood so it feels a little icky to me… and it’s funnier if she’s throwing herself at him and he’s trying to be all noble and push her away.
Plus she’s baby!Belle, even if she’s sixteen right now, and I feel all big sisterly and protective.
Notes
-
margaretmoony likes this
-
hoshitoyume likes this
-
accio-firewhiskey likes this
-
petitegrimm likes this
-
calonari reblogged this from rufeepeach and added:
NO It makes you PERFECT
-
lillysbitchfest reblogged this from rufeepeach and added:
Hey if she’s the one doing the chasing it’s all cool with me!
-
oldandnewfirm reblogged this from rufeepeach and added:
…It worked for George Knightley and Emma.
-
shadowhostage likes this
-
rufeepeach reblogged this from valerieparker and added:
You’re all as bad as each other. And I’m writing the damn thing, so does that make me worse?
-
valerieparker reblogged this from rufeepeach and added:
But it’s the only thing I’ve ever wanted. (also, loves me some awkward!young Belle.)
-
rushslittlebelles likes this
-
cyprith reblogged this from rufeepeach and added:
In FTL, 15 was probably old enough to marry. It’s more than old enough to go to war, after all, and without healthcare,...
-
athelstanned likes this
-
valoscope likes this
-
oldandnewfirm said:
Well it IS fairy tale land…if we’re meant to compare it to the 16th/15th centuries, they probably marry young over there.
-
calonari likes this
-
oldandnewfirm likes this
-
rufeepeach posted this
